Your Opportunities, Your Rights, Your Immigration Lawyer
Meet Morella
Born in Nicaragua, Attorney Morella Aguado studied Law at the American University (UAM) of Nicaragua, obtaining with honors the title of Bachelor of Laws from that prestigious institution. Morella Aguado is a Lawyer and Notary Public approved by the Supreme Court of Justice of Nicaragua. After finishing her career as a lawyer in Nicaragua, she decided to study law again in the United States, also obtaining a law degree, Juris Doctor (JD) at the University of Miami, Morella was approved by the BAR of the State of the Florida and has practiced as an Immigration and Naturalization Attorney for several years in the United States.
Morella has experienced first-hand the long and complex migratory processes that cause stress and uncertainty for immigrants. Her experience and that of her family as an immigrant in the United States is what led her to become interested in the area of Immigration Law.
Morella is a member of the Florida State Bar Association, as well as the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). He has extensive experience in the area of litigation in court before Immigration Judges, stopping deportations and returning parents to their homes. As well as, in Family and Employment Petitions, Non-Immigrant Visas, Naturalization Processes, DACA cases and VAWA cases
Mission
Our Mission is to keep our families together, stop the fear that overwhelms us daily for millions of Latinos. Morella Aguado wants us all to be able to go out to work and study every day without the fear of not knowing if we will return to dinner together. She comes from a family of immigrants and knows the sorrows that Latinos suffer on a daily basis. Having herself legalized several of her relatives, she is sure that she will also be able to do it for thousands of families, including her own.
The Immigration Office of Attorney Morella Aguado, P.A. she firmly believes that every immigrant in the United States can have a better quality of life if she knows her rights and learns how to enforce those rights.
Media
Morella has been invited to several television programs to talk about immigration issues
Google Reviews
Services
GREEN CARDS
DETENTION CASES
WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILITY
CITIZENSHIP AND NATURALIZATION
BOND HEARING
VISAS
UNLAWFUL PRESENCE WAIVER
REMOVAL DEFENSE
APPEALS
- Nieces of Late Iranian Terror Commander Face Deportationon April 6, 2026 at 2:10 pm
More disclosures about Afshar and Hosseiny are sure to emerge in coming days, and the usual groups will likely rush to their defense. Here’s a pro tip from an immigration lawyer with more than 30 years of experience, however: If you are a former asylee applying for U.S. citizenship, don’t travel back home — and refrain from referring to your place of refuge as the “Great Satan”.
- DHS Funding Follies Continueon April 3, 2026 at 1:23 pm
Congress created DHS to move all federal activities relevant to homeland security under one roof, but in so doing it made the department vulnerable to kidnappers, who at the moment don’t seem to be certain what ransom they are demanding in exchange for their hostages.
- CIS Comments on the Immigration Courts’ Appellate Efficiency Ruleon April 3, 2026 at 10:00 am
Collectively, these reforms represent a coherent and necessary response to longstanding structural challenges and will better equip EOIR to fulfill its core mission of delivering fair, timely, and consistent adjudications.
- USCIS to Resume Processing Some Asylum Applicationson April 2, 2026 at 1:18 pm
The resumption of asylum processing does not signal a return to the status quo. The government has emphasized that stricter vetting will continue, and the broader immigration restrictions, including travel bans from high-risk countries identified in Trump’s presidential proclamation, remain in effect.
- Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Birthright Citizenshipon April 2, 2026 at 1:12 pm
It’s tough to glean much from Supreme Court arguments, especially when the subject is as seemingly simple yet theoretically arcane as birthright citizenship. What is clear, however, is that Congress in 1868 could have made the justices’ job a lot easier if they had just told us what “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States means.
